In this April 10, 2021 photo, a woman carries a free food supply bag as others wait at a distributing point ahead of Ramadan in Lahore. (ARIF ALI / AFP)
PARIS – Emergency measures by governments helped keep food supply functioning during the COVID-19 pandemic, but agricultural policies continue to pour out subsidies inefficiently without encouraging sustainable production, the OECD said on Tuesday.
Only about 14 percent of total support for the farm sector went towards structural areas like research and development, the OECD said
As coronavirus spread last year, countries took various steps including the creation of so-called green lanes for cross-border food transport and increased food aid for households, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development said.
“As a result, policies were generally successful in maintaining the overall functioning of food supply chains, albeit within an overall structure of agricultural support programmes that showed little change,” the OECD said in an annual survey of farming policy.
Reviewing 54 advanced and emerging economies, the Paris-based organisation estimated that a total of US$720 billion per year was transferred to agriculture over the 2018-2020 period.
Three-quarters of this support was in aid for farmers, most of which was through what the OECD sees as market-distorting instruments like price controls or production subsidies.
Only about 14 percent of total support for the farm sector went towards structural areas like research and development, the OECD said.
ALSO READ: EU bans hazardous plastic waste exports to non-OECD countries
Support rewarding environmental services was relatively marginal, with just US$1.5 billion out of US$268 billion per year in budgetary payments to producers clearly tied to such services, it estimated.
“Overall, most current support policies are not serving the wider needs of food systems,” the OECD said.
The OECD study echoed criticisms by the European Court of Auditors in a report on Monday that the European Union’s huge farm subsidy programme is failing to rein in greenhouse gas emissions.
The OECD recognised that crop technology has allowed a reduction in the intensity of resource use, with global food production having grown much faster than consumption of land or inputs like fertiliser.
But many subsidies could be redirected towards innovation or environmental services to curb emissions and other negative environmental effects of agriculture, it added.