Major overhaul of WHO needed after lapses, says review panel

The World Health Organization should be overhauled and given more authority to investigate global disease threats, according to a review of the international COVID-19 response that found a myriad of failures, gaps, and delays allowed the coronavirus to mushroom into a pandemic.

While stopping short of assigning blame to any particular factor, the report released Wednesday by an independent panel co-chaired by former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark linked the severity of the global outbreak to deficiencies across governments, the WHO and other multilateral organizations, and regulations that guide official actions.

While stopping short of assigning blame to any particular factor, the report released Wednesday by an independent panel co-chaired by former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark linked the severity of the global outbreak to deficiencies across governments, the WHO and other multilateral organizations, and regulations that guide official actions

The panel also called for an agreement to waive vaccine patents, limited terms for WHO leaders, and an oversight body and legally binding treaty to bolster the prevention and response to future pandemics. The international system, the panel said, remains unfit to avoid another disease from spiraling into one matching COVID-19, which threatens to cost the world economy US$22 trillion by 2025.

“The situation we find ourselves in today could have been prevented,” former Liberia President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, the panel’s other co-chair, told reporters over Zoom Monday. “This was partly due to a failure to learn from the past.”

In the first weeks of the pandemic, the WHO could have warned countries to assume that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was spreading among people as a precaution, according to the panel, which was established at the request of the World Health Assembly, WHO’s decision-making body, a year ago.

ALSO READ: WHO: COVID-19 deaths in Europe surpass 1m

The WHO was hindered by its regulations, which aren’t conducive to taking a precautionary approach, according to Clark. The “slow and deliberate pace” with which information is treated under the International Health Regulations and the alert system used were out of step with a fast-moving respiratory pathogen and the swift availability of information through digital tools and social media, the panel found.

It added that the elevation of the COVID-19 threat to WHO’s highest level of alert on Jan 30, 2020, failed to trigger an urgent, coordinated, worldwide response. It called for disease surveillance and alert systems to be overhauled to function at “near-instantaneous speed” to detect and verify signals of potential outbreaks.

‘Sowed Distrust’

Most countries failed to heed the warning, choosing to “wait and see,” rather than take firmer measures that could have contained the virus, Clark said, adding that February was “a month of lost opportunity.”

“For some, it wasn’t until hospital ICU beds started to fill that more action was taken — and by then it was too late,” she said. “There were also countries which devalued science, denied the severity of COVID-19, delayed responding, and sowed distrust among their citizens — with deadly consequences.”

Although missed opportunities and failure to act characterized much of the early response to COVID-19, the panel found areas in which early action was taken to good effect: the rapid containment of the virus by some countries, including South Korea, Vietnam and New Zealand, and the unprecedented speed at which the virus genome was sequenced and vaccines were developed.

“Science delivered when the world needed it most, and the world benefited wherever there was open sharing of data and knowledge,” according to Johnson Sirleaf.

ALSO READ: WHO says doesn't back vaccination passports for now

The Harvard-educated former banker said the WHO and the World Trade Organization should help broker an agreement among major vaccine-producing countries and manufacturers on voluntary licensing and transferring vaccine technology to third parties.

IP Rights

“If actions do not occur within three months, a waiver of intellectual property rights under the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights should come into force immediately,” Johnson Sirleaf said.

While manufacturing needs to be scaled up urgently, the panel called on wealthy countries with adequate vaccine coverage to commit to providing at least 1 billion doses no later than Sept 1 to 92 countries that lack adequate supplies, and to increase that to a total of 2 billion by mid-2021.

The panel also called for the creation of a Global Health Threats Council that will maintain political commitment to pandemic preparedness and response and hold actors accountable.

It said a Pandemic Framework Convention was needed within six months to address gaps in international regulations, and to clarify responsibilities between states and international organizations.

It called for a special high-level session of the United Nations General Assembly to agree on a political declaration on transforming pandemic preparedness and response.

ALSO READ: WHO chief: Little done to address virus vaccine inequity

The panel said the authority and financing of the WHO should also be strengthened, including by developing a new funding model to end earmarked funds and to increase member-state fees.

An international pandemic-financing facility capable of disbursing US$5 billion to US$10 billion a year for preparedness and US$50 billion to US$100 billion in the event of a crisis should also be created, the panel said.

It also called for a single, seven-year term for the WHO director-general and regional directors.

“COVID-19 is the 21st century’s Chernobyl moment — not because a disease outbreak is like a nuclear accident, but because it has shown so clearly the gravity of the threat to our health and well-being,” the report reads. 

“It has caused a crisis so deep and wide that presidents, prime ministers and heads of international and regional bodies must now urgently accept their responsibility to transform the way in which the world prepares for and responds to global health threats.”

READ MORE: Vaccine disparities raise alarm as COVID-19 variants multiply